What is the difference between these syntactical constructions: "Amparo es la que vuelve" and "La que vuelve es Amparo"? When do you use them? What additional meaning does each construction have?|||No difference, escept for the emphasis you put in the first part of each sentence. In the sentence "Amparo es la que vuelve", "Amparo" is subject, "es" is verb, and "la que vuelve" is predicate. The most important thing in this sentence is "Amparo". You can use this sentence to answer this question: 驴Qui茅n es Amparo? (Who is Amparo?) The sentence "La que vuelve es Amparo" can be understood exactly as the first one, just in a different order (predicate+verb+subject). Or you can take "La que vuelve" as subject (a nominal phrase can be subject), "es" is verb, and "Amparo" the predicate. Then you can use this sentence to answer a question like this: 驴Qui茅n es la vuelve? (Which is the one that comes back?).|||When in doubt, pick the one that sound prettiest!:)|||the word 'Amparo' could be a noun, not a name, meaning that in "la que vuelve es Amparo" ur saying "Amparo is coming home (or returning)" and in "Amparo es la que vuelve", you could be saying "Safety is returning" if it is intended as a name, however, I would go with the latter ("La que vuelve..") because it is clearer...

火车采集器

dairy queen locations